Selene Finance, L.P. v. Sunrise Highlands Community Association, 2:16-cv-02521-KJD-NJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180104d78
Visitors: 42
Filed: Dec. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), SELENE FINANCE L.P. ("Bank"), and SUNRISE HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("Sunrise"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The parties recently submitted a proposed stipulation to extend the briefing schedule for any replies to the pending motions for summary judgment on November 21, 2017. [E
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), SELENE FINANCE L.P. ("Bank"), and SUNRISE HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("Sunrise"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The parties recently submitted a proposed stipulation to extend the briefing schedule for any replies to the pending motions for summary judgment on November 21, 2017. [EC..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), SELENE FINANCE L.P. ("Bank"), and SUNRISE HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("Sunrise"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The parties recently submitted a proposed stipulation to extend the briefing schedule for any replies to the pending motions for summary judgment on November 21, 2017. [ECF No. 52]. However, the parties seek an additional extension.
2. SFR filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on September 13, 2017. [ECF No. 41].
3. The Bank filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on September 13, 2017. [ECF No. 42].
4. Sunrise filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on September 13, 2017. [ECF No. 43].
5. The parties previously requested that the deadline for any replies be continued to December 13, 2017.
6. The parties hereby stipulate and agree that any replies in support of SFR's Mot. [ECF No. 41], the Bank's Mot. [ECF No. 42] and Sunrise's Mot. [ECF No. 43] be filed on or before December 20, 2017.
7. This is the fourth request for an extension of these deadlines and it is not made for the purposes of delay. The additional time requested is to allow counsel to meaningfully respond to the arguments raised in each motion.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
