Peters v. Cox, 3:15-CV-00472-RCJ-VPC. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180201i33
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2017
Summary: Plaintiff's Motion For Extension of Time To Reply re #53 Plaintiff's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions LR IA 6-1 FIRST REQUEST VALERIE P. COOKE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, Dan M. Winder, of The Law Offices of Dan M. Winder hereby moves this Court grant an extension of time for Plaintiff to reply to Defendant's Response (#54 12/18.17) to Plaintiff's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions (#53 12/04/17) on the following grounds: 1. Delivery of a copy of the Defen
Summary: Plaintiff's Motion For Extension of Time To Reply re #53 Plaintiff's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions LR IA 6-1 FIRST REQUEST VALERIE P. COOKE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, Dan M. Winder, of The Law Offices of Dan M. Winder hereby moves this Court grant an extension of time for Plaintiff to reply to Defendant's Response (#54 12/18.17) to Plaintiff's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions (#53 12/04/17) on the following grounds: 1. Delivery of a copy of the Defend..
More
Plaintiff's Motion For Extension of Time To Reply re #53
Plaintiff's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions
LR IA 6-1
FIRST REQUEST
VALERIE P. COOKE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, Dan M. Winder, of The Law Offices of Dan M. Winder hereby moves this Court grant an extension of time for Plaintiff to reply to Defendant's Response (#54 12/18.17) to Plaintiff's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions (#53 12/04/17) on the following grounds:
1. Delivery of a copy of the Defendants' Response to the Plaintiff is necessarily delayed due to Plaintiff being a prisoner and the prison's procedures in dealing with legal mail.
2. Plaintiff's input into the reply is critical since the Defendants are utilizing 5 previously undisclosed witnesses who purport to dispute Plaintiff's counsel's current understanding of the facts.
3. The Holiday Season Vacations and Office Closures make a reply due on the Day after Christmas extremely burdensome. Plaintiff's counsel's office is scheduled to be closed on both December 22d and December 29th.
Considering the delays occasioned by the difficulties of communication between Plaintiff and his counsel due to Plaintiff being incarcerated and the burdens which would be imposed on Plaintiff's counsel during the holiday season if time to respond to the Response is not granted, Plaintiff requests this Court grant Plaintiff until January 8th, 2018 to Reply to the Response.
Defendant would in no way be prejudiced by this delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
