Christiana Trust v. Red Lizard Productions LLC, 2:15-cv-01851-JCM-PAL. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180402e89
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 09, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [FIRST REQUEST] JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff CHRISTIANA TRUST, A DIVISION OF CHRISTIANA SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT AS TRUSTEE OF ARLP TRUST 3 ("Christiana Trust" or "Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel of record and Defendants RED LIZARD PRODUCTIONS LLC ("Red Lizard") and RLP — SHASTA DAISY, LLC ("RLP-Shasta"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [FIRST REQUEST] JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff CHRISTIANA TRUST, A DIVISION OF CHRISTIANA SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT AS TRUSTEE OF ARLP TRUST 3 ("Christiana Trust" or "Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel of record and Defendants RED LIZARD PRODUCTIONS LLC ("Red Lizard") and RLP — SHASTA DAISY, LLC ("RLP-Shasta"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby s..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[FIRST REQUEST]
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff CHRISTIANA TRUST, A DIVISION OF CHRISTIANA SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT AS TRUSTEE OF ARLP TRUST 3 ("Christiana Trust" or "Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel of record and Defendants RED LIZARD PRODUCTIONS LLC ("Red Lizard") and RLP — SHASTA DAISY, LLC ("RLP-Shasta"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed a Motion for summary Judgment ("Motion") on September 8, 2017. See [ECF No. 45];
2. RLP-Shasta and Red Lizard filed their Opposition to the Motion on December 25, 2017. See [ECF No. 52];
3. Plaintiff's response to the Opposition is due by November 8, 2017. Id.;
4. The Parties hereby stipulate and agree that the deadline for Plaintiff's response shall be extended to November 15, 2017; and
5. There is good cause to allow the extension in order to accommodate the schedule of counsel and the Parties have reached this agreement in good faith.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing thereof, the Court hereby orders that Plaintiff's response to RLP-Shasta and Red Lizard's Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment is due November 15, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
