Filed: Jan. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2018
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO HERITAGE SQUARE SOUTH HOME OWENERS ASSOCIATION, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Heritage Square south Homeowners' Association, Inc. ("Heritage") and The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-12CB, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-12CB ("BNYM") hereby stipulate and a
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO HERITAGE SQUARE SOUTH HOME OWENERS ASSOCIATION, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Heritage Square south Homeowners' Association, Inc. ("Heritage") and The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-12CB, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-12CB ("BNYM") hereby stipulate and ag..
More
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO HERITAGE SQUARE SOUTH HOME OWENERS ASSOCIATION, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS
(FIRST REQUEST)
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Heritage Square south Homeowners' Association, Inc. ("Heritage") and The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-12CB, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-12CB ("BNYM") hereby stipulate and agree that Heritage shall have an additional seven (7) days, up to and including January 9, 2018, to file its response to BNYM's Response to Motion to Dismiss Complaint, which is currently due on January 3, 2018, pursuant to ECF No. 26. Heritage's motion to dismiss complaint was filed on November 29, 2017.
Recently, multiple stays have been lifted that add to an abnormally heavy case load at this point in time. Handling counsel is engaging in trial preparation as well as deposition preparation on multiple other cases in this matter. Additionally, the Response to the Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 26] was filed in the middle of the holiday season. This created a delay in review and response.
This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
