Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2:13-CV-00649-JCM-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180109a98
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2018
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR NON-PARTY FREDDIE MAC'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [ECF NO. 115] (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . BOURNE VALLEY COURT TRUST ("Bourne Valley") hereby moves to extend the deadline for Bourne Valley to respond to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation's ("Freddie Mac") Motion for Protective Order [ECF No. 115] as follows: 1. Freddie Mac filed its Motion for Protective Order on Friday, December 22, 2017. [ECF No. 115]. An
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR NON-PARTY FREDDIE MAC'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [ECF NO. 115] (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . BOURNE VALLEY COURT TRUST ("Bourne Valley") hereby moves to extend the deadline for Bourne Valley to respond to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation's ("Freddie Mac") Motion for Protective Order [ECF No. 115] as follows: 1. Freddie Mac filed its Motion for Protective Order on Friday, December 22, 2017. [ECF No. 115]. Any..
More
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR NON-PARTY FREDDIE MAC'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [ECF NO. 115]
(First Request)
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
BOURNE VALLEY COURT TRUST ("Bourne Valley") hereby moves to extend the deadline for Bourne Valley to respond to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation's ("Freddie Mac") Motion for Protective Order [ECF No. 115] as follows:
1. Freddie Mac filed its Motion for Protective Order on Friday, December 22, 2017. [ECF No. 115]. Any response is currently due on Friday, January 5, 2018.
2. The parties agree to continue the response deadline to Freddie Mac's Motion for Protective Order one business day to Monday, January 8, 2018. Bourne Valley received written confirmation from counsel for Freddie Mac, counsel for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and counsel for the Parks Homeowners Association that they do not object to the short extension. However, Bourne was unable to prepare, circulate and obtain signatures on a stipulation before the close of business.
3. This is the first request for an extension of these deadlines and it is not made for the purposes of delay. The additional time requested by Bourne Valley is requested due to the holidays and sickness of counsel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
