Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Valencia-Sandoval v. First Mortgage Corp., 2:17-cv-02982-APG-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180109b30 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . COMES FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION, (hereinafter "FMC") on the one hand by and through their counsel of record Thomas N. Beckom, Esq of the law firm of McCarthy & Holthus LLP; and JOSE M. VALENCIA-SANDOVAL ("Plaintiff") by and through their counsel of record Rachel B. Saturn, Esq of the law firm of Haines & Krieger, LLC and hereby file this Stipulation and Order for an Extension of time to file FMC's answer. RECIT
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER

COMES FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION, (hereinafter "FMC") on the one hand by and through their counsel of record Thomas N. Beckom, Esq of the law firm of McCarthy & Holthus LLP; and JOSE M. VALENCIA-SANDOVAL ("Plaintiff") by and through their counsel of record Rachel B. Saturn, Esq of the law firm of Haines & Krieger, LLC and hereby file this Stipulation and Order for an Extension of time to file FMC's answer.

RECITALS

1. On December 22, 2017 FMC appeared in this action via the Notice of Appearance at Docket No. 5. 2. FMC is desirous of additional time to analyze this complaint and file an appropriate response. 3. In addition, the holiday season has also resulted in slight delays due to personal matters between the parties and holiday travel plans. 4. The parties however agree on that basis for a stipulation to extend time for FMC to respond to the Plaintiff's complaint.

STIPULATION

It is hereby STIPULATED that FMC shall have until January 22, 2018 to respond to the Plaintiff's Complaint

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer