ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE FOLEY, JR.

MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (ECF No. 77) ("R&R") regarding the Court's Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 74) issued on September 26, 2107. Plaintiff was allowed until December 22, 2017, to file an objection. To date, no objection to the R&R has been filed.1

This Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party timely objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, then the court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party fails to object, however, the court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2003) (disregarding the standard of review employed by the district court when reviewing a report and recommendation to which no objections were made); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (reading the Ninth Circuit's decision in Reyna-Tapia as adopting the view that district courts are not required to review "any issue that is not the subject of an objection."). Thus, if there is no objection to a magistrate judge's recommendation, then the court may accept the recommendation without review. See, e.g., Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d at 1226 (accepting, without review, a magistrate judge's recommendation to which no objection was filed).

Nevertheless, this Court finds it appropriate to engage in a de novo review to determine whether to adopt Magistrate Judge Foley's R&R. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing this case with prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order. Plaintiff has also failed to file a notice of change of address with the Court as required under LR IA 3-1. Upon reviewing the R&R and the filings in this case, this Court finds good cause to adopt the Magistrate Judge's R&R in full.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (ECF No. 77) is accepted and adopted in its entirety.

It is ordered that Plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1) is dismissed with prejudice.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case and enter judgment accordingly.