Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:17-cv-00457-KJD-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180110c31 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FIRST REQUEST GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW Plaintiff/Counter-defendant, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-R10 (hereinafter "Deutsche Bank"), Defendant, Northbrook Homeowners Association, Inc. ("Northbrook"), and Defendant/Counter-claimant SFR Investments Pool 1,
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FIRST REQUEST

COMES NOW Plaintiff/Counter-defendant, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-R10 (hereinafter "Deutsche Bank"), Defendant, Northbrook Homeowners Association, Inc. ("Northbrook"), and Defendant/Counter-claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), by and through their respective counsel of record, and hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed its Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 42] on December 15, 2017, and responses thereto are due on January 5, 2018;

2. Northbrook filed its Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 43] on December 15, 2017, and responses thereto are due on January 5, 2018;

3. SFR filed its Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 44] on December 15, 2017;, and responses thereto are due on January 5, 2018;

4. Northbrook filed its Response in Opposition to Deutsche Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 45] on December 29, 2017;

5. The current deadline to file Oppositions to the pending Motions for Summary Judgment is January 5, 2018;

6. The Parties agree to extend the deadlines to file any remaining Oppositions from January 5, 2018 to January 19, 2018;

7. The Parties further agree to extend the deadlines to file Replies in Support of their Respective Motions from January 19, 2018 to February 2, 2018.

8. This extension is requested due to the holiday schedule in which counsel for the parties would be absent from work due to the closure of their respective offices in observance of the Christmas and New Year's Day holidays.

9. This is the parties' first request for extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer