U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, Inc., 2:17-cv-01128-GMN-VCF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180116c27
Visitors: 41
Filed: Jan. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF Nos. 31 and 32) (FIRST REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Defendant Independence II Homeowners' Association ("Independence') and Plaintiffs U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCITION, AS TRUSTEE FOR GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST 2006-6, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-6 ("US Bank"), and Counterdefendant's, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS"), ") hereby stipulate and agr
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF Nos. 31 and 32) (FIRST REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Defendant Independence II Homeowners' Association ("Independence') and Plaintiffs U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCITION, AS TRUSTEE FOR GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST 2006-6, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-6 ("US Bank"), and Counterdefendant's, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS"), ") hereby stipulate and agre..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF Nos. 31 and 32)
(FIRST REQUEST)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
Defendant Independence II Homeowners' Association ("Independence') and Plaintiffs U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCITION, AS TRUSTEE FOR GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST 2006-6, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-6 ("US Bank"), and Counterdefendant's, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS"), ") hereby stipulate and agree that a reciprocal extension of seven (7) days, up to and including January 17, 2018, shall be granted to Plaintiffs and Defendant to file their response to their respective Motions for Summary Judgment. ECF Nos. 31 and 32. Plaintiffs' and Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment were filed contemporaneously on December 20, 2017.
Recently, multiple stays have been lifted that add to an abnormally heavy case load at this point in time. Counsel for both Parties are experiencing an abnormally heavy case load and trial preparation as well as multiple motion hearings and depositions that require additional time to review and analyze the issues presented. This created a delay in review and response.
This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
