Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA v. Harris, 2:09-cr-00223. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180117b43 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Telia U. Williams, Esq., counsel for the defendant, Ronald Harris, and Robert A. Knief, Assistant United States Attorney, that the hearing to determine whether to revoke Mr. Harris' supervised release, which was scheduled for today, January 16, 2018 at 8:00am, (and which was continued to tomorrow, January 17, 2018 at 11:00am), be continued to som
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Telia U. Williams, Esq., counsel for the defendant, Ronald Harris, and Robert A. Knief, Assistant United States Attorney, that the hearing to determine whether to revoke Mr. Harris' supervised release, which was scheduled for today, January 16, 2018 at 8:00am, (and which was continued to tomorrow, January 17, 2018 at 11:00am), be continued to some future date after Mr. Harris is tried or enters a plea agreement in his other case, United States v. Ronald Harris, Case No. 2:16-cr-00014. Trial in this latter matter is tentatively scheduled to occur on March 12, 2018. Hence, the court should hold Mr. Harris' revocation hearing after that aforementioned date. Ms. Williams is dealing with a family emergency (which resulted in her missing today's hearing), and which makes it difficult for her to effectively assist Mr. Harris tomorrow, as well.

ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the court finds that the Stipulation by and between the United States and Ronald Harris to continue the revocation hearing in this case is entered into in good faith, due to counsel for the defendant having a family emergency. The defendant also requests that his revocation hearing take place after the date of his trial in another case, United States v. Ronald Harris, Case No. 2:16-cr-00014, which trial is scheduled for March 12, 2018.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Denial of this request for continuance would deny the defendant's counsel opportunity to resolve her family emergency and prepare for the defendant's revocation hearing.

Thus, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Revocation Hearing that was scheduled for January 17, 27, 2018 at 11:00 am, be continued to March 30, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7C.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer