Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pacific Energy & Mining Company v. Maximilian Resources LLC, 3:17-CV-00363-HDM-VPC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180122937 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT MAXIMILIAN RESOURCES LLC'S MOTION [DOC 30] (FIRST REQUEST) HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . Plaintiff PACIFIC ENERGY & MINING COMPANY and defendant MAXIMILIAN RESOURCES LLC stipulate that Plaintiff shall have up to and including February 2, 2018 to respond to the Defendant's Motion to (i) Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (2) and/or (3), (ii) Tran
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT MAXIMILIAN RESOURCES LLC'S MOTION [DOC 30]

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff PACIFIC ENERGY & MINING COMPANY and defendant MAXIMILIAN RESOURCES LLC stipulate that Plaintiff shall have up to and including February 2, 2018 to respond to the Defendant's Motion to (i) Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (2) and/or (3), (ii) Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404, or (iii) Stay this Action [Doc 30].

Plaintiff PACIFIC ENERGY & MINING COMPANY requested this extension, and the Defendant agreed, to allow Plaintiff time to draft the opposition. In addition Plaintiff PACIFIC ENERGY & MINING COMPANY and defendant MAXIMILIAN RESOURCES LLC have are attempting to resolve this matter without the need for further litigation.

This is the first requested extension to respond to Defendant's motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer