Filed: Jan. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . COMES NOW Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the CMLT1 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-AMC3 ("U.S. Bank"), by and through its attorneys of record, Edgar C. Smith, Esq., and Patrick J. Davis, Esq., of the law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, and 508 Bruny Island Trust ("Bruny") by and through its attorneys of record, Luis A. Ayon, Esq
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . COMES NOW Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the CMLT1 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-AMC3 ("U.S. Bank"), by and through its attorneys of record, Edgar C. Smith, Esq., and Patrick J. Davis, Esq., of the law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, and 508 Bruny Island Trust ("Bruny") by and through its attorneys of record, Luis A. Ayon, Esq...
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
COMES NOW Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the CMLT1 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-AMC3 ("U.S. Bank"), by and through its attorneys of record, Edgar C. Smith, Esq., and Patrick J. Davis, Esq., of the law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, and 508 Bruny Island Trust ("Bruny") by and through its attorneys of record, Luis A. Ayon, Esq. of Ayon Law, PLLC, stipulate and agree to mutually extend the deadline to respond to their respective Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 53 and 54) for three (3) weeks until February 13, 2017 2018. Both of the parties Motions for Summary Judgment were filed on January 2, 2017 2018.
Recently, multiple stays have been lifted that add to an abnormally heavy case load at this point in time. Counsel for both Parties are experiencing an abnormally heavy case load and trial preparation as well as multiple motion hearings and depositions that require additional time to review and analyze the issues presented. This created a delay in review and response.
This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
