Nationstar Mortgage LLC. v. Safari Homeowners Association, 2:16-cv-02542-RFB-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180129b15
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR SAFARI HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO NATIONSTAR'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 40], (First Request). RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage, LLC ("Nationstar"), and Defendant Safari Homeowners' Association (collectively "The Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows: 1. The Parties' stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Safari to file its Response
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR SAFARI HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO NATIONSTAR'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 40], (First Request). RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage, LLC ("Nationstar"), and Defendant Safari Homeowners' Association (collectively "The Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows: 1. The Parties' stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Safari to file its Response t..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR SAFARI HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO NATIONSTAR'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 40], (First Request).
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage, LLC ("Nationstar"), and Defendant Safari Homeowners' Association (collectively "The Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows:
1. The Parties' stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Safari to file its Response to Nationstar's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No.40] which was filed on January 3, 2018, to and including Wednesday, January 31, 2018;
2. This is the first request for an extension of time for Safari to file its Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No.40; and,
3. The Parties' request for this extension is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. Rather, this brief extension will accommodate the schedule of counsel and their conflicts with the current deadlines.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
