Konecne v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., 2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180129b28
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jan. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2018
Summary: REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(b) (ECF NO. 71) (THIRD REQUEST) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, to extend the deadline for Defendant Allied Van Lines, Inc. ("Defendant") to respond to Plaintiffs Megan Konecne's and Howard Misle's ("Plaintiffs") Motion for Relief under FRCP 60(b)
Summary: REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(b) (ECF NO. 71) (THIRD REQUEST) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, to extend the deadline for Defendant Allied Van Lines, Inc. ("Defendant") to respond to Plaintiffs Megan Konecne's and Howard Misle's ("Plaintiffs") Motion for Relief under FRCP 60(b) (..
More
REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(b) (ECF NO. 71)
(THIRD REQUEST)
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
The above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, to extend the deadline for Defendant Allied Van Lines, Inc. ("Defendant") to respond to Plaintiffs Megan Konecne's and Howard Misle's ("Plaintiffs") Motion for Relief under FRCP 60(b) (ECF No. 71, filed on December 6, 2017). As the parties have set forth in their other stipulations (all approved by the Court), the parties still require additional time to finalize the settlement agreement. In the past week, the parties have conferred several times in an attempt to resolve the final form of their settlement agreement. As such, extending the due date for Defendant's response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Rule 60(b) Relief (ECF No. 71) from January 23, 2018 to February 6, 2018 should afford the parties sufficient time to finalize the agreement, thereby bringing this matter to a resolution and thus obviating the need for filing any responses.
This is the parties' third request to extend the deadline by which Defendant may file a Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief under Rule 60(b) (ECF No. 71).
The proposed extension is requested in good faith and will not prejudice any party.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
