Elawyers Elawyers

U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, Inc., 2:17-cv-01128-GMN-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180130f88 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REPLY DEADLINE [First Request] GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-6, Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2006-6 and Cross-Defendant, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee Beneficiary for Astoria Financial, LLC ("Plaintiff") and Defendants SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree to e
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REPLY DEADLINE

[First Request]

Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-6, Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2006-6 and Cross-Defendant, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee Beneficiary for Astoria Financial, LLC ("Plaintiff") and Defendants SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file a Reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, currently set for January 24, 2017 until January 31, 2018.

Due to an inadvertent calendaring error, Plaintiff mistook the filing deadline for the one that is now being stipulated to, and SFR has agreed to allow Plaintiff to abide by that deadline. This extension is sought in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer