McKissick v. City of Reno, 3:17-CV-00458-MMD-VPC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180130g06
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (SECOND REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, MARK MAUSERT, and Defendant, by and through its attorney, WILLIAM E. COOPER, Deputy City Attorney, herby stipulate to extend the Defendant's deadline to file a Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition of Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (SECOND REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, MARK MAUSERT, and Defendant, by and through its attorney, WILLIAM E. COOPER, Deputy City Attorney, herby stipulate to extend the Defendant's deadline to file a Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition of Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
(SECOND REQUEST)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, MARK MAUSERT, and Defendant, by and through its attorney, WILLIAM E. COOPER, Deputy City Attorney, herby stipulate to extend the Defendant's deadline to file a Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition of Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 32) from January 31, 2018 to February 9, 2018.
The extension of this deadline is requested to accommodate counsels' schedule, and is not brought for any improper purpose or undue delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
