Brodeur v. Cox Communications, Inc., 2:18-CV-00024-RFB-VCF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180131e98
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, that the Defendant's time to file an answer, move, or other otherwise file a responsive pleading to the Plaintiff's Complaint be extended by thirty (30) days, up to and including March 1, 2018. This is the first requested extension, and it is for good cause and not for purp
Summary: STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, that the Defendant's time to file an answer, move, or other otherwise file a responsive pleading to the Plaintiff's Complaint be extended by thirty (30) days, up to and including March 1, 2018. This is the first requested extension, and it is for good cause and not for purpo..
More
STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, that the Defendant's time to file an answer, move, or other otherwise file a responsive pleading to the Plaintiff's Complaint be extended by thirty (30) days, up to and including March 1, 2018.
This is the first requested extension, and it is for good cause and not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
