Filed: Feb. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS [First Request] ECF No. 20 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-BR3, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-BR3, by and through its attorneys of record, Edgar C. Smith, Esq., and Patrick J. Davis, Esq., of the law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, and Defendant SFR Investments
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS [First Request] ECF No. 20 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-BR3, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-BR3, by and through its attorneys of record, Edgar C. Smith, Esq., and Patrick J. Davis, Esq., of the law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, and Defendant SFR Investments P..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[First Request]
ECF No. 20
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-BR3, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-BR3, by and through its attorneys of record, Edgar C. Smith, Esq., and Patrick J. Davis, Esq., of the law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, and Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC by and through its attorneys of record Diana S. Ebron, Esq., Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Esq. and Karen L. Hanks, Esq. of the law firm of Kim Gilbert Ebron hereby submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Deadline to Respond to Motion to Dismiss in accordance with LR IA 6-1.
Counsel for Plaintiff requires further time to fully address the complex legal issues set forth in SFR's Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS HEREBY STIPUALTED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARITES that the deadline currently scheduled for February 5, 2018, be extended until February 19, 2018.
This is the parties first request to extend the deadline. This request is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
