Filed: Feb. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR GAYLE A. KERN, LTD. DBA KERN & ASSOCIATES, LTD. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT [First Request] WILLIAM G. COBB , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff, CHAMPERY RENTAL REO, LLC ("Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel, Hutchison & Steffen, LLC, and Defendant, Gayle A. Kern, Ltd. dba Kern & Associates, Ltd. ("Kern"), by and through its counsel Kern & Associates, Ltd., to extend the deadline for
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR GAYLE A. KERN, LTD. DBA KERN & ASSOCIATES, LTD. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT [First Request] WILLIAM G. COBB , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff, CHAMPERY RENTAL REO, LLC ("Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel, Hutchison & Steffen, LLC, and Defendant, Gayle A. Kern, Ltd. dba Kern & Associates, Ltd. ("Kern"), by and through its counsel Kern & Associates, Ltd., to extend the deadline for ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR GAYLE A. KERN, LTD. DBA KERN & ASSOCIATES, LTD. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
[First Request]
WILLIAM G. COBB, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff, CHAMPERY RENTAL REO, LLC ("Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel, Hutchison & Steffen, LLC, and Defendant, Gayle A. Kern, Ltd. dba Kern & Associates, Ltd. ("Kern"), by and through its counsel Kern & Associates, Ltd., to extend the deadline for Kern to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint to March 9, 2018.
Kern was served with Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint and Summons on or about January 19, 2018, which makes Kern's responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint due February 9, 2018, currently.
Plaintiff and Kern (collectively referred to as the "Parties") stipulate and agree to an extension of the deadline for Kern to answer or otherwise respond to the Third Amended Complaint up-to-and-including March 9, 2018. The Parties are engaged in substantive discussions regarding potential resolution of this matter and wish to conserve the time and resources of the Parties and the Court while such discussions move forward. Therefore, good cause exists for the extension. This is the first request for an extension of time with respect to this matter and is not intended to cause delay or prejudice to any party.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
