Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Allstate Insurance Company v. Shah, 2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180213972 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (the "Allstate Parties"), and Defendants and Counterclaimant RUSSELL J. SHAH, M.D., DIPTI R.
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (the "Allstate Parties"), and Defendants and Counterclaimant RUSSELL J. SHAH, M.D., DIPTI R. SHAH, M.D., RADAR MEDICAL GROUP, LLP dba UNIVERSITY URGENT CARE, RUSSELL J. SHAH, MD, LTD., and DIPTI R. SHAH, MD, LTD. (the "Radar Parties"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On January 24, 2018, the Radar Parties filed their Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of their Motion for Summary Judgement [ECF No. 224] (the "Stay Motion");1

2. On February 1, 2018, the Allstate Parties filed their Motion for Leave of Court to File Supplemental Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [LR 7-2(g)] [ECF No. 230] (the "Motion for Leave");

3. On February 7, 2018, the Allstate Parties filed their Opposition to the Stay Motion [ECF No. 233];

4. The Radar Parties presently have until February 14, 2018 to file their Reply in Support of the Stay Motion. Due to scheduling conflicts for the Radar Parties' counsel, and because the arguments to be presented in the Reply in Support of the Stay Motion will address, in part, the arguments to be presented in the Opposition to the Motion for Leave, the Radar Parties shall now have up to and including February 23, 2018 to file their Reply in Support of the Stay Motion; and

5. This is the first stipulation to extend the deadline to file the Reply in Support of the Stay Motion. This stipulation is made in good faith and not to delay the proceedings.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The Radar Parties filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (Hearing Requested) [ECF No. 183] on October 17, 2017. The Allstate Parties filed their Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 195] on November 21, 2017. The Radar Parties filed their Reply in Support of the Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 213] on December 22, 2017.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer