Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO (Second Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff Kerri Shapiro ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Treasure Island, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company d/b/a Treasure Island Hotel & Casino and Ruffin Acquisition, LLC, a limited liability company (both Defendants collectively as "Treasure Island"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as foll
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO (Second Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff Kerri Shapiro ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Treasure Island, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company d/b/a Treasure Island Hotel & Casino and Ruffin Acquisition, LLC, a limited liability company (both Defendants collectively as "Treasure Island"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follo..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
(Second Request)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff Kerri Shapiro ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Treasure Island, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company d/b/a Treasure Island Hotel & Casino and Ruffin Acquisition, LLC, a limited liability company (both Defendants collectively as "Treasure Island"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed her Complaint in this matter on November 22, 2017;
2. Plaintiff filed a Motion to Consolidate Cases (ECF No. 5) on or about November 30, 2017;
3. On or about January 26, 2018, this Court entered an Order extending the deadline until February 14, 2018 for Treasure Island to respond to both the Complaint and the Motion to Consolidate;
4. Plaintiff and Treasure Island agree that Treasure Island shall have an additional thirty days, up to and including March 16, 2018, to file and serve a responsive pleading and a Response to the Motion to Consolidate;
5. The purpose of the extension is that this case involves class-wide allegations under the Internet Tax Freedom Act, and additional time is required to fully investigate and respond;
6. This stipulation and order is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
