Filed: Feb. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE (First Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Cross-Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") and Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Cross-Claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to amend the briefing schedules on the Parties' respective Motions
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE (First Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Cross-Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") and Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Cross-Claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to amend the briefing schedules on the Parties' respective Motions f..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(First Request)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Cross-Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") and Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Cross-Claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to amend the briefing schedules on the Parties' respective Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 40/42 and 44)1 as follows:
1. Chase filed its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 40 and 42) on January 8, 2018.
2. SFR filed its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44) on January 8, 2018.
3. Chase filed its Response to SFR's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 46) on January 29, 2018.
4. SFR filed its Response Chase's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 47) on January 29, 2018.
5. The Parties hereby stipulate that they will have up to and until February 28, 2018 (current due date is February 12, 2018) to file their Replies in support of their respective Motions for Summary Judgment.
6. This is the Parties' first request to extend time for these Motions.
7. The Parties agreed to this extension to accommodate the schedules of counsel and to offset necessary delays in briefing related to the Motions.
The Parties make this request for a brief extension of time in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
