Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Isbell v. Party City Corporation, 3:17-cv-709-MMD-VPC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180220b91 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) VALERIE P. COOKE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Devon Isbell ("Plaintiff") and defendant Party City Corporation ("Party City"), through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 1. Defendant Party City was served with the summons and Plaintiff's amended complaint on December 28, 2017. Party City's response to the amended complaint was originally due by January 18, 2017. 2. As a result of excusable
More

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff Devon Isbell ("Plaintiff") and defendant Party City Corporation ("Party City"), through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant Party City was served with the summons and Plaintiff's amended complaint on December 28, 2017. Party City's response to the amended complaint was originally due by January 18, 2017.

2. As a result of excusable neglect resulting from the switch of counsel handling this case, a response to the amended complaint was not filed by January 18, 2017.

3. Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, the parties stipulated to a 30-day extension for Party City to file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff's amended complaint, such that the new deadline for the response will be February 19, 2018.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer