US Bank National Association v. Thunder Properties Inc., 3:17-cv-00203-RCJ-WGC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180220d37
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO HIGHLAND RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (THIRD REQUEST) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiff US Bank National Association, as Trustee for Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC2 (" US Bank or Plaintiff ") and Defendant Highland Ranch Homeowners Association, (" Highland or " Defendant "), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that US Bank
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO HIGHLAND RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (THIRD REQUEST) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiff US Bank National Association, as Trustee for Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC2 (" US Bank or Plaintiff ") and Defendant Highland Ranch Homeowners Association, (" Highland or " Defendant "), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that US Bank ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO HIGHLAND RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(THIRD REQUEST)
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Plaintiff US Bank National Association, as Trustee for Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC2 ("US Bank or Plaintiff") and Defendant Highland Ranch Homeowners Association, ("Highland or "Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that US Bank shall have up to and including March 9, 2018 to respond to Highland's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 26) (the "MSJ") filed on December 15, 2017. The opposition is currently due February 9, 2018. The parties further agree that Highland shall have until March 28, 2018 to file its reply. The reply would otherwise have been due on February 27, 2018.
The parties have commenced discussions regarding the potential for settling this case, or at least reaching a resolution of the MSJ short of a need for motion practice and additional time for the Court. The parties being able to conduct those discussions in the next couple weeks with enough time to either resolve this matter or file the response before the extended deadline. Accordingly, good cause exists for the extension.
Based on the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant this stipulation.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
