Buapha v. Berryhill, 2:15-cv-01870-JAD-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180220i77
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2018
Summary: Order Adopting Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 27] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Rungphet Buapha appeals an administrative law judge's decision to deny various disability benefits 1 and moves to have that decision reversed and remanded to the Social Security Administration (SSA). 2 The SSA cross moves to affirm it. 3 Magistrate Judge George Foley recommends that I deny Buapha's motion to reverse and remand and grant the SSA's cross motion to affirm. 4 The deadline to object
Summary: Order Adopting Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 27] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Rungphet Buapha appeals an administrative law judge's decision to deny various disability benefits 1 and moves to have that decision reversed and remanded to the Social Security Administration (SSA). 2 The SSA cross moves to affirm it. 3 Magistrate Judge George Foley recommends that I deny Buapha's motion to reverse and remand and grant the SSA's cross motion to affirm. 4 The deadline to object ..
More
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation
[ECF No. 27]
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Rungphet Buapha appeals an administrative law judge's decision to deny various disability benefits1 and moves to have that decision reversed and remanded to the Social Security Administration (SSA).2 The SSA cross moves to affirm it.3 Magistrate Judge George Foley recommends that I deny Buapha's motion to reverse and remand and grant the SSA's cross motion to affirm.4
The deadline to object to Judge Foley's recommendation was January 26, 2018.5 That deadline has come and gone, and Buapha has remained silent.6 "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed."7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Foley's report and recommendation [ECF No. 27] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. Buapha's motion to reverse and remand [ECF No. 21] is DENIED, and the SSA's cross motion to affirm [ECF No. 25] is AFFIRMED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE.
FootNotes
1. ECF No. 1-1.
2. ECF No. 21.
3. ECF No. 25.
4. ECF No. 27.
5. Id.
6. See generally docket report case no. 2:15-cv-01870-JAD-GWF.
7. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Source: Leagle
