Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

US Bank National Association v. Thunder Properties Inc., 3:17-cv-00203-RCJ-WGC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180221c99 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO HIGHLAND RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (SECOND REQUEST) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiff US Bank National Association, as Trustee for Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC2 (" US Bank or Plaintiff ") and Defendant Highland Ranch Homeowners Association, (" Highland or " Defendant "), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that US Ban
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO HIGHLAND RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiff US Bank National Association, as Trustee for Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC2 ("US Bank or Plaintiff") and Defendant Highland Ranch Homeowners Association, ("Highland or "Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that US Bank shall have up to and including February 9, 2018 to respond to Highland's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 26) (the "MSJ") filed on December 15, 2017. The opposition was originally due on January 5, 2018, but the Parties had previously stipulated to extend that deadline to January 17, 2018, although it does not appear that the Court signed the earlier stipulation and order during the holidays. The parties further agree that Highland shall have until February 27, 2018 to file its reply. The reply would otherwise have been due on February 23, 2018.

US Bank is in the process of reviewing the MSJ and the arguments raised therein. US Bank is also assessing recent decisions and orders from other Courts that may have an effect on its opposition to the MSJ. Additionally, the undersigned counsel for US Bank is scheduled for a five day jury trial that has made preparation of the opposition difficult, especially with the holidays. Accordingly, additional time will be required and good cause exists for the extension.

Based on the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant this stipulation.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer