Federal National Mortgage Association v. Willis, 2:15-cv-02366-JCM-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180221k67
Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Order on the Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines (First Request) (ECF No. 107) required the parties to file a joint pretrial order pursuant to LR 26-1(b)(5) no later than May 12, 2017, or 30 days after a decision on the dispositive motions. A motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 234) was decided on January 22, 2018, in which cas
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Order on the Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines (First Request) (ECF No. 107) required the parties to file a joint pretrial order pursuant to LR 26-1(b)(5) no later than May 12, 2017, or 30 days after a decision on the dispositive motions. A motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 234) was decided on January 22, 2018, in which case..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Order on the Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines (First Request) (ECF No. 107) required the parties to file a joint pretrial order pursuant to LR 26-1(b)(5) no later than May 12, 2017, or 30 days after a decision on the dispositive motions. A motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 234) was decided on January 22, 2018, in which case the date for filing the Joint Pretrial Order was suspended until 30 days after the decision. There are no further dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that
1. Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than February 27, 2018. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
2. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be included in the pretrial order.
Source: Leagle
