Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

The Bank of New York Mellon v. Richardson, 2:16-cv-02714-RFB-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180222g07 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF BNYM'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 24] (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff and Counterdefendant The Bank of New York Mellon, Successor Trustee to JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Trustee F/B/O Holders of Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Inc., Bear Stearns Alt-A Trust 2005-10, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-10 ("BNYM"), Defendants/Counterclai
More

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF BNYM'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 24]

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff and Counterdefendant The Bank of New York Mellon, Successor Trustee to JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Trustee F/B/O Holders of Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Inc., Bear Stearns Alt-A Trust 2005-10, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-10 ("BNYM"), Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs Michael F. Richardson and M. Jane Jamey Trust, a Nevada Trust; and Michael F. Richardson and M. Jane Ramey, as Trustees; ("Richardson") and Defendant Regent at Town Centre Homeowners' Association ("Regent") (together the "Parties") hereby submit the following Stipulated Motion and Order to Extend Deadline for BNYM's Reply in Support of BNYM's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF NO. 24]. On January 17, 2018, BNYM filed its Motion for Summary Judgment. On the same day, Regent filed its Motion for Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 25]. On February 6, 2018, both Regent and Richardson filed oppositions to BNYM's Motion for Summary Judgment. [ECF Nos. 26, 27]. On February 7, 2018, BNYM filed an opposition to Regent's Motion for Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 28].

The current deadline for BNYM's Reply in Support of BNYM's Motion for Summary Judgment is Tuesday, February 20, 2018. The Parties have stipulated to the short extension to accommodate the schedules of counsel. The extension is not sought for purposes of prejudice or delay. Accordingly, the Parties hereby request an extension of the deadline for BNYM's Reply in Support of BNYM's Motion for Summary Judgment until Wednesday, February 28, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer