Wilmington Trust Company v. Malavar-Jaimez, 2:17-cv-02537-JAD-VCF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180223f40
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Wilmington Trust Company, as Successor to U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for Mastr Alternative Loan Trust 2004-8 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-8 (" Wilmington ") and Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (" SFR "), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree to stay discovery and submission of the proposed discovery plan and scheduling
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Wilmington Trust Company, as Successor to U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for Mastr Alternative Loan Trust 2004-8 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-8 (" Wilmington ") and Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (" SFR "), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree to stay discovery and submission of the proposed discovery plan and scheduling ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY
(First Request)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Wilmington Trust Company, as Successor to U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for Mastr Alternative Loan Trust 2004-8 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-8 ("Wilmington") and Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree to stay discovery and submission of the proposed discovery plan and scheduling order ("DPSO") until the Court rules on SFR's "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [ECF No. 1] Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6)" (the "Motion") [ECF No. 19].
The current deadline for the parties to submit the DPSO is February 26, 2018. However, due to the pending Motion, which is based on a legal challenge to the Complaint (ECF No. 1), and should not require a factual determination by the Court, the Parties agree that it is most economical for the Parties and the Court to stay discovery and submission of the DPSO until after the Court rules on the Motion. The requested stay is sought in good faith and not for the purpose of undue delay or to prejudice any party.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a status hearing is scheduled for 10:00 AM, August 22, 2018, in Courtroom 3D.
Source: Leagle
