Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Galicia v. Plusfour, Inc., 2:17-cv-02495-JCM-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180226b78 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT [Second Request] CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . This Stipulation is filed pursuant to LR IA 6-1. Plaintiff filed this action on September 26, 2017. On January 9, 2018 Defendant filed its pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [#8]. This is the second stipulation for an extension oftime to respond to Defendant's pending motion practice. This Stipulation is entered
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Second Request]

This Stipulation is filed pursuant to LR IA 6-1. Plaintiff filed this action on September 26, 2017. On January 9, 2018 Defendant filed its pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [#8]. This is the second stipulation for an extension oftime to respond to Defendant's pending motion practice. This Stipulation is entered at Plaintiff's request. Plaintiff does not intend to request any further extension.

Plaintiff's response is currently due February 23, 2018. The parties stipulated to an extension through February 23, 2018 with Defendant's optional Reply brief due by March 16, 2018 [#12]. The parties now stipulate to a further extension through March 23, 2018 with Defendant's optional Reply Briefdue by April 16, 2018.

The additional time will allow the parties to further review and assess their respective positions short of immediate protracted motion practice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer