Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pistiner v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, 2:18-cv-00196. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180226b82 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT WELLS RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiffs Irving Pistiner and Marta Pistiner ("Plaintiffs"), through their attorney, Mitchell D. Gliner, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows: In the interest of conserving client and judicial resources, Plaintiffs and Wells Farg
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT WELLS RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiffs Irving Pistiner and Marta Pistiner ("Plaintiffs"), through their attorney, Mitchell D. Gliner, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows:

In the interest of conserving client and judicial resources, Plaintiffs and Wells Fargo stipulate and agree that Wells Fargo shall have an extension until March 16, 2018, in which to file its responsive pleading. This is the parties' first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is intended so that Wells Fargo can conduct a diligent search and obtain records necessary to prepare its response.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to on or before March 16, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer