Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fioravante v. Leica Microsystems, Inc., 2:18-cv-00059-GMN-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180228f87 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (First Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiffs Joseph Fioravante and Modern Orthopaedics, LLC, (" Plaintiffs ") and Defendants, Brandon Elggren and South Ridge Microsurgical, Inc., collectively the (" Applicable Defendant s"), through counsel, hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to Local Rules 6-1, 6-2 and 7-1 as follows: STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Pla
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

(First Request)

COMES NOW, Plaintiffs Joseph Fioravante and Modern Orthopaedics, LLC, ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants, Brandon Elggren and South Ridge Microsurgical, Inc., collectively the ("Applicable Defendants"), through counsel, hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to Local Rules 6-1, 6-2 and 7-1 as follows:

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Applicable Defendants that Defendants Brandon Elggren and South Ridge Microsurgical, Inc. shall have an extension of time until March 26, 2018 to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [Dkt. 3] in order to allow additional time for the Applicable Defendants to evaluate the allegations set forth in the Amended Complaint and the factual circumstances underlying such allegations. Plaintiffs are agreeable to the requested extension as a matter of professional courtesy. This is the first stipulation for an extension of time for the Applicable Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by the parties that this stipulation does not constitute any waiver of claims for defenses and that the extension of time to file a responsive pleading includes an extension to file a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b).

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by the parties that this stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer