HSBC Bank USA, National Association v. Thunder Properties Inc., 3:16-cv-00467-RCJ-WGC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180307850
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING HSBC'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . HSBC Bank USA, National Association as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AP2 ("HSBC"), Thunder Properties Inc. ("Thunder Properties"), and Eagle Canyon Association (the "HOA"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to extend HSBC's deadline to reply to Thunder an
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING HSBC'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . HSBC Bank USA, National Association as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AP2 ("HSBC"), Thunder Properties Inc. ("Thunder Properties"), and Eagle Canyon Association (the "HOA"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to extend HSBC's deadline to reply to Thunder and..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING HSBC'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Second Request)
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
HSBC Bank USA, National Association as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AP2 ("HSBC"), Thunder Properties Inc. ("Thunder Properties"), and Eagle Canyon Association (the "HOA"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to extend HSBC's deadline to reply to Thunder and the HOA's responses to HSBC's motion for summary judgment. HSBC's current deadline for the reply to the HOA's response is February 19, 2018. HSBC's current deadline for the reply to Thunder Properties' response is February 21, 2018. The Parties stipulate and agree that HSBC shall have until March 21, 2018 to file its reply. In support of their request for a stay of discovery, the Parties show as follows:
The parties have commenced discussions regarding the potential for settling this case. The parties are working on finalizing those discussions in the next couple weeks. The extension sought will permit enough time to either resolve this matter or file the replies before the extended deadline. Accordingly, good cause exists for the extension. The Parties, therefore, respectfully request that this extension is granted.
IT IS ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
