U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Rio Vista Homeowners Association, 2:16-cv-2604-JCM-PAL. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180308b56
Visitors: 1
Filed: Mar. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order as required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The last extension of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 49) filed May 30, 2017, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than November 17, 2017. There are no dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that 1. Counsel for
Summary: ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order as required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The last extension of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 49) filed May 30, 2017, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than November 17, 2017. There are no dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that 1. Counsel for ..
More
ORDER
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order as required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The last extension of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 49) filed May 30, 2017, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than November 17, 2017. There are no dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that
1. Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than March 20, 2018. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a recommendation to the District Judge of case dispositive sanctions.
2. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be included in the pretrial order.
Source: Leagle
