Carroll v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02237-MMD-PAL. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180308b90
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REVERSAL OR REMAND PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand be extended for one week from March 2, 2018 to March 9, 2018 . This is Defendant's third request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Cou
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REVERSAL OR REMAND PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand be extended for one week from March 2, 2018 to March 9, 2018 . This is Defendant's third request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Coun..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REVERSAL OR REMAND
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand be extended for one week from March 2, 2018 to March 9, 2018. This is Defendant's third request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel for Defendant has a debilitating migraine that impairs her vision on the date of the current filing deadline. In addition, Counsel has over 75+ active pending matters, of which require 2+ dispositive motions until mid April. Counsel also has three pending Ninth Circuit matters which require additional levels of review due in early March. Due to unanticipated leave and high workload demands, Counsel needs additional time to properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Counsel apologizes for the belated request but did not anticipate being out on leave due to her debilitating migraine. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
Source: Leagle
