Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ward v. Nevada ex rel. Board of Medical Examiners, 2:17-cv-03029-JAD-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180308b91 Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING PENDING MOTIONS AND AGREEING TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST) ECF No. 39 JENNIFER DORSEY , District Judge . COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, LARA WARD ("Ward"), by and through her attorney, JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ., of the law firm HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP, and Defendants, STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. its BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, PAMELA CASTAGNOLA, KIM FRIEDMAN, KATI PAYTON, and EDWARD COUSINEAU, by and through their attorney, S. BRETT SUTT
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING PENDING MOTIONS AND AGREEING TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)

ECF No. 39

COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, LARA WARD ("Ward"), by and through her attorney, JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ., of the law firm HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP, and Defendants, STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. its BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, PAMELA CASTAGNOLA, KIM FRIEDMAN, KATI PAYTON, and EDWARD COUSINEAU, by and through their attorney, S. BRETT SUTTON, ESQ., of SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION, P.C., hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on or about January 4, 2018, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike Scandalous Matter and Motion for a More Definite Statement (collectively "the Motions" or "Motions");

WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred extensively with respect to the Motions, and Plaintiff agreed to file a First Amended Complaint addressing, at least in part, certain of the concerns raised by Defendants' Motions to the satisfaction of all counsel without waiving any rights;

WHEREAS, on or about February 5, 2018, the Court entered the Parties' Joint Stipulation and Order concerning the First Amended Complaint by which the Parties agreed, and the Court ordered, that Plaintiff provide a copy of the Proposed Amended Complaint to Defendants' counsel not later than February 12, 2018 for the purposes of discussing any dispute related to the Proposed Amended Complaint before requesting a hearing date on Defendants' Motions, such that Plaintiff would be in a position to file a First Amended Complaint not later than February 28, 2018 after meeting and conferring with Defendants;

WHEREAS, Defendants did not receive a copy of Plaintiff's Proposed First Amended Complaint until February 26, 2018, and as such have not yet had the opportunity to fully meet and confer with Plaintiff about the changes to the Proposed First Amended Complaint, about which Defendants still have serious concerns;

THEREFORE, based on all of the foregoing, the Parties jointly stipulate and respectfully request that the Court issue an Order as follows:

1. Since a continuing dispute exists and both the parties are working on a resolution, it has been agreed to stipulate that the new file date shall be from two weeks from the date of February 28, 2018. That the Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint not later than March 14, 2018, which will:

a. List and separately allege each cause of action against each Defendant and will note, in what capacity each Defendant is being sued for each cause of action; b. List the factual predicates of each cause of action in accordance with general rules of pleading; c. Remove the allegations in paragraph 72 a-z of the Complaint; d. Remove the causes of action under NRS and for Negligent Hiring/Supervision.

2. Parties agree to discuss any unresolved issues with respect to the Proposed First Amended Complaint prior to requesting a hearing date on Defendants' Motions or filing further responsive motions regarding the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer