Filed: Mar. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE TO MOTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, TO CONDUCT ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY AND FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE [FIRST REQUEST] CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION David Copperfild, Christopher Kenner, David Copperfield's Disappearing Inc., Backstage Employment and Referral, Inc. and Imagine Nation Company (collectively the "Copperfield Parties") by and through their attorneys of the law firm Hollan
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE TO MOTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, TO CONDUCT ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY AND FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE [FIRST REQUEST] CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION David Copperfild, Christopher Kenner, David Copperfield's Disappearing Inc., Backstage Employment and Referral, Inc. and Imagine Nation Company (collectively the "Copperfield Parties") by and through their attorneys of the law firm Holland..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE TO MOTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, TO CONDUCT ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY AND FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE
[FIRST REQUEST]
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
STIPULATION
David Copperfild, Christopher Kenner, David Copperfield's Disappearing Inc., Backstage Employment and Referral, Inc. and Imagine Nation Company (collectively the "Copperfield Parties") by and through their attorneys of the law firm Holland & Hart, LLP and Plaintiffs Daniel Berro, Christopher Oberle, Seth Duhy, Shane Engle, Jamie Edelman, Daniel Morris, Douglas McKeever, Ashley Kelly, Zachary Mitchell, Johnny Mitchell, Trevor Goff, and Taylor Doyle (collectively the "Named Plaintiffs") by and through their counsel The Medrala Law Firm, Prof., LLC:
HEREBY STIPULATE:
The parties have engaged in good faith discussions that may resolve this pending MOTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, TO CONDUCT ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY AND FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTOINS SHOULD NOT ISSUE (the "Motion") Docket No. 44 in its entirety.
Under LR II 7-2(b), response to a Motion is due 14-days after the date of service. The Response would be due March 9, 2018. Therefore, this stipulation to continue the response date is timely before this Court.
For good cause shown herein, the Parties hereby stipulate to continue the Response date from March 9, 2018, to March 20, 2018. The dates thereafter shall comply with LR II 7-2(b).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.