Castillo v. Western Range Association, 3:16-cv-00237-RCJ-VPC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180312c45
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2018
Summary: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Object to Bills of Cost and for Leave to File a Unified Objection ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . After the Court's order dismissing Plaintiffs' claims, Defendants filed three bills of cost and Plaintiffs' objections are currently due on March 12, 2018 and March 13, 2018. See Docs. 142, 143, 144. Plaintiffs request leave to file a single unified objection to all three bills of cost and for an extension until March 19, 2018 to file the unified o
Summary: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Object to Bills of Cost and for Leave to File a Unified Objection ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . After the Court's order dismissing Plaintiffs' claims, Defendants filed three bills of cost and Plaintiffs' objections are currently due on March 12, 2018 and March 13, 2018. See Docs. 142, 143, 144. Plaintiffs request leave to file a single unified objection to all three bills of cost and for an extension until March 19, 2018 to file the unified ob..
More
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Object to Bills of Cost and for Leave to File a Unified Objection
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
After the Court's order dismissing Plaintiffs' claims, Defendants filed three bills of cost and Plaintiffs' objections are currently due on March 12, 2018 and March 13, 2018. See Docs. 142, 143, 144. Plaintiffs request leave to file a single unified objection to all three bills of cost and for an extension until March 19, 2018 to file the unified objection. This is the first motion to extend time to object to the bills of cost.
Plaintiffs intend to object to the bills of cost, at least in part, based on their inability to pay. See Stanley v. University of Southern California, 178 F.3d 1069, 1079 (9th Cir. 1999). Because some Plaintiffs currently reside in remote areas of Peru, Plaintiffs need the extra time to supply their attorneys with evidence of that inability to pay for submission to the Court. Plaintiffs additionally request that they be permitted to file a unified objection because arguments regarding ability to pay will be the same or similar across all objections and a unified objection will therefore be more efficient for the Court to consider. Prior to filing, Plaintiffs conferred with all Defendants regarding this Motion. Defendants do not oppose this Motion.
Plaintiffs therefore request that:
1. Their deadline to respond to all of Defendants' bills of cost (Docs. 142, 143, 144) be extended to March 19, 2018; and
2. They be granted leave to file a single unified response to Defendants' bills of cost (Docs. 142, 143, 144).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
