Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

The Bank of New York Mellon v. Paradise Court Homeowners' Association, 2:16-cv-00390-GMN-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180314e36 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARADISE COURT HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 85] GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Defendant Paradise Court Homeowners' Association (the "Association"), and Plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon (the "Bank"), by and through their respective counsel stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On February 5, 2018, the Association filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 85. 2. On February 26,
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARADISE COURT HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 85]

Defendant Paradise Court Homeowners' Association (the "Association"), and Plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon (the "Bank"), by and through their respective counsel stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On February 5, 2018, the Association filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 85. 2. On February 26, 2018, the Bank filed its Opposition to the Association's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 91. 3. The Association's Reply is due on or before March 12, 2018. 4. The Association and the Bank hereby stipulate to extend the time for the Association to file its Reply to and including March 26, 2018.

IT HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Association will have a twoweek extension to file its Reply.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Association's Reply shall be filed on or before March 26, 2018.

This is the parties' first request of this deadline and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer