Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY (SECOND REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff, JAMES M. REESE, (hereinafter, "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, the law firm of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and Defendants 1 Parole Board members CONNIE BISBEE, ED GRAY, JR., and MICHAEL KEELER, Parole Board employee DARLA FOLEY, and Parole & Probation Office
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY (SECOND REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff, JAMES M. REESE, (hereinafter, "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, the law firm of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and Defendants 1 Parole Board members CONNIE BISBEE, ED GRAY, JR., and MICHAEL KEELER, Parole Board employee DARLA FOLEY, and Parole & Probation Officer..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY
(SECOND REQUEST)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
COMES NOW, Plaintiff, JAMES M. REESE, (hereinafter, "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, the law firm of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and Defendants1 Parole Board members CONNIE BISBEE, ED GRAY, JR., and MICHAEL KEELER, Parole Board employee DARLA FOLEY, and Parole & Probation Officers TODD KAYLOR, JONI BILLICH and MICHAEL SLIVA (hereinafter collectively "Defendants"), by and through its counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Nevada Attorney General, and Michael M. Miles, Nevada Deputy Attorney General, and do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF #75] and the time for Defendant to Reply to Plaintiff's Response.
This request is submitted pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2 and LR II 7-1 and 26-4 and is the parties' second request for an extension concerning an extension of the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.
This request is made as Plaintiff has been unable to meet with Plaintiff's counsel due to an extensive work schedule and out-of-state travel for a new job, and conflicts with Plaintiff's counsel's schedule and ability to meet with Plaintiff. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall have an additional six (6) days up to and including March 14, 2018 to respond to Defendant's Motion and Defendants shall have up to and including April 6, 2018 to file a Reply, to accommodate Defendants' counsel's planned vacation.
In addition, a settlement conference is scheduled for March 21, 2018 and settlement briefs are due to the Court March 14, 2018 per this Court's ORDER, [ECF #77]. The parties have agreed to stipulate that Defendant shall have until March 16, 2018, by 4:00 p.m., to provide Defendant's settlement brief to the Court to provide time for Defendant to review Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on March 14, 2018. Plaintiff will propose a separate stipulation and order to the Magistrate Judge for review of the proposed extension of the time for Defendants to provide their settlement conference brief to the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
