Anoruo v. Valley Health System, LLC, 2:18-cv-00105-MMD-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180315f00
Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE (Docket No. 25) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's motion for leave to file a response to Plaintiff's motion for protective order. Docket No. 25. Defendant submits that it believes Plaintiff will file his motion for protective order on an ex parte basis, and asks the Court to unseal the motion and allow it to respond. See id. Plaintiff's motion for protective order, however, was filed on the public docket.
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE (Docket No. 25) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's motion for leave to file a response to Plaintiff's motion for protective order. Docket No. 25. Defendant submits that it believes Plaintiff will file his motion for protective order on an ex parte basis, and asks the Court to unseal the motion and allow it to respond. See id. Plaintiff's motion for protective order, however, was filed on the public docket. S..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
(Docket No. 25)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant's motion for leave to file a response to Plaintiff's motion for protective order. Docket No. 25. Defendant submits that it believes Plaintiff will file his motion for protective order on an ex parte basis, and asks the Court to unseal the motion and allow it to respond. See id. Plaintiff's motion for protective order, however, was filed on the public docket. See Docket No. 26.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion for leave to file, Docket No. 25, is DENIED as moot. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's motion in compliance with the schedule the Court set for discovery motions in Docket No. 21.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
