Rosalez-Martinez v. Nevada, 3:10-CV-00748-MMD-VPC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180319898
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REPLY DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS CITY OF RENO, COLBY PALMER AND RICK AYALA (FIRST REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff, Pedro Rosales Martinez by and through his attorney L. Edward Humphrey, and Defendants City of Reno, Colby Palmer and Rick Ayala (hereinafter, "City Defendants") by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the due date for City Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Omnibus Opposition to Motions to Di
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REPLY DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS CITY OF RENO, COLBY PALMER AND RICK AYALA (FIRST REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff, Pedro Rosales Martinez by and through his attorney L. Edward Humphrey, and Defendants City of Reno, Colby Palmer and Rick Ayala (hereinafter, "City Defendants") by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the due date for City Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Omnibus Opposition to Motions to Dis..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REPLY DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS CITY OF RENO, COLBY PALMER AND RICK AYALA
(FIRST REQUEST)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Pedro Rosales Martinez by and through his attorney L. Edward Humphrey, and Defendants City of Reno, Colby Palmer and Rick Ayala (hereinafter, "City Defendants") by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the due date for City Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Omnibus Opposition to Motions to Dismiss (ECF # 166) from March 15, 2018 to March 29, 2018.
The extension of this deadline is requested to accommodate the schedule of counsel for Reno Defendants, and is not brought for any improper purpose or undue delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
