Bank of America, N.A. v. Boulder Ranch Master Association, 2:16-cv-01319-GMN-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180320d27
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE AND CONTINUE HEARING GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Boulder Ranch Master Association, Defendants Val Grigorian and Diana Rozenberg and Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A., stipulate as follows: 1. Defendants Val Grigorian and Diana Rozenberg filed a Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs on February 28, 2018. [ECF No. 56] 2. Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. filed their opposition to Mot
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE AND CONTINUE HEARING GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Boulder Ranch Master Association, Defendants Val Grigorian and Diana Rozenberg and Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A., stipulate as follows: 1. Defendants Val Grigorian and Diana Rozenberg filed a Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs on February 28, 2018. [ECF No. 56] 2. Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. filed their opposition to Moti..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE AND CONTINUE HEARING
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Boulder Ranch Master Association, Defendants Val Grigorian and Diana Rozenberg and Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A., stipulate as follows:
1. Defendants Val Grigorian and Diana Rozenberg filed a Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs on February 28, 2018. [ECF No. 56]
2. Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. filed their opposition to Motion to Enforce Settlement March 14, 2018. [ECF No. 59]
3. The parties agree that the deadline for Boulder Ranch Master Association to file a response to Motion to Enforce Settlement [ECF No. 56] should be extended to Friday, March 16. 2018. Boulder Ranch Master Association requires additional time to prepare a response and this constitutes good cause.
4. The parties further agree that due to a scheduling conflict the hearing on the Motion to Enforce scheduled for March 28, 2018 should be continued to a date and time after
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
