Henderson v. Hughes, 2:16-cv-01837-JAD-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180320d28
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 235), filed on February 28, 2018. No party has filed a response. Under Local Rule 7-2(d), the "failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion." As no response has been filed, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 235), filed on February 28, 2018. No party has filed a response. Under Local Rule 7-2(d), the "failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion." As no response has been filed, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS T..
More
ORDER
C.W. HOFFMAN, JR., Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 235), filed on February 28, 2018. No party has filed a response.
Under Local Rule 7-2(d), the "failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion." As no response has been filed, the Court will grant the motion.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 235) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file a proposed order consistent with the requests made in the motion to compel no later than April 2, 2018.
Source: Leagle
