Filed: Mar. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO REPLY TO MONITOR'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAIONT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, STAY THE PROCEEDINGS (FIRST REQUEST) KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Plaintiff, Court-Appointed Monitor Thomas W. McNamara ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, Michael F. Lynch of the Lynch Law Practice, PLLC and Edward Chang and Logan Smith of McNamara Smith LLP and Defendants Charles M. Hallinan and Hallinan Capital Corp. ("Defendants"), by and t
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO REPLY TO MONITOR'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAIONT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, STAY THE PROCEEDINGS (FIRST REQUEST) KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Plaintiff, Court-Appointed Monitor Thomas W. McNamara ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, Michael F. Lynch of the Lynch Law Practice, PLLC and Edward Chang and Logan Smith of McNamara Smith LLP and Defendants Charles M. Hallinan and Hallinan Capital Corp. ("Defendants"), by and th..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO REPLY TO MONITOR'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAIONT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, STAY THE PROCEEDINGS
(FIRST REQUEST)
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Court-Appointed Monitor Thomas W. McNamara ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, Michael F. Lynch of the Lynch Law Practice, PLLC and Edward Chang and Logan Smith of McNamara Smith LLP and Defendants Charles M. Hallinan and Hallinan Capital Corp. ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel, Jarrod L. Rickard of Semenza Kircher Rickard, hereby stipulate to the following:
WHEREAS, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, in the Alternative, Stay the Proceedings (the "Motion to Dismiss") was filed on January 29, 2018 (ECF No. 17);
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Response to the Motion to Dismiss on March 12, 2018 (ECF No. 20);
WHEREAS, Defendants' deadline to file its reply to Plaintiff's Response to the Motion to Dismiss is currently March 19, 2018; and
WHEREAS, the parties stipulate, subject to Court approval, that Defendants' deadline to file its reply to the Motion to Dismiss shall be extended by 1 week, to March 26, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
