Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Richardson v. U.S., 2:17-cv-00775-JCM-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180322f65 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Barbara D. Richardson, in her capacity as Receiver of Nevada Health Co-Op ("Richardson" or the "Receiver") and Defendants, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al. ("United States" or "HHS") (together, the Parties), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to continue the hearing set for Tuesday, April 3, 2018 for 42 days to May 15, 2018
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER

Plaintiff, Barbara D. Richardson, in her capacity as Receiver of Nevada Health Co-Op ("Richardson" or the "Receiver") and Defendants, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al. ("United States" or "HHS") (together, the Parties), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to continue the hearing set for Tuesday, April 3, 2018 for 42 days to May 15, 2018 (or a date that is convenient to the Court thereafter). There are two reasons for this stipulated request. First, since the Parties' second stipulation, an important medical appointment has been scheduled for HHS's counsel in Virginia on the same date as the April 3, 2018 hearing. Second, the Parties continue to progress in resolving their dispute.

Pending before the Court is Richardson's Proposed Scheduling Order (Dkt. 30) and the United States' Motion to Reject Plaintiff's Proposed Scheduling Order (Dkt. 31). The Court set Tuesday, April 3, 2018 for hearing on this dispute. This is the third request to reschedule that hearing.

The Parties respectfully request that the Court continue the hearing to May 15, 2018 or a date thereafter that is convenient for the Court, and that Plaintiff's Response to the United States' Motion to Reject Plaintiff's Proposed Scheduling Order be set at 5 days prior to the hearing date.

All parties stipulate and consent to the granting of the relief requested herein, and no prejudice will result to any party from the granting of such relief.

Having reviewed and considered the matter,IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS ORDERED that the scheduling conference on the [30] Case Management Report, and [31] Motion to Deny Case Management Report currently set for April, 30, 2018 at 9:00 a.m., is VACATED CONTINUEDand UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEto May 21, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3A.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's response to the [31] Motion to Deny Case Management Report is due no later than May 14, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer