Filed: Mar. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff, TOD FARMER (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, the law firm of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and Defendant AZURE GAMING AMERICA, INC. (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through its counsel, Littler Mendelson, P.C., and do hereby stipulate and agree to an extensio
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff, TOD FARMER (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, the law firm of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and Defendant AZURE GAMING AMERICA, INC. (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through its counsel, Littler Mendelson, P.C., and do hereby stipulate and agree to an extension..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY
(First Request)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
COMES NOW, Plaintiff, TOD FARMER (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, the law firm of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and Defendant AZURE GAMING AMERICA, INC. (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through its counsel, Littler Mendelson, P.C., and do hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF #5). Accordingly, Plaintiff shall have up to and including April 20, 2018 to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF #5) and Defendant shall have up to and including May 4, 2018 to reply. This is the parties' first request.
Plaintiff's response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is currently due March 23, 2018. Plaintiff's counsel requests the extension due to conflicts in his work schedule and his pending vacation beginning March 24, 2018. Defendant's counsel will also be on vacation when Defendant's reply would be due on or about March 30, 2018.
This request is submitted pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2 and LR 7-1 and 26-4 and is the parties' first request for an extension concerning an extension of the time for Plaintiff to respond to dispositive motions deadline.
IS SO ORDERED.
