Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cabral v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation, : 2:17-cv-02930-APG-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180323f27 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO: (1) EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [ECF No. 22]; AND (2) EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On March 14, 2018, pursuant to this Court's Order Granting Stipulations [ECF No. 21], Defendants filed a consolidated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint [EC
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO:

(1) EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [ECF No. 22]; AND

(2) EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

(FIRST REQUEST)

On March 14, 2018, pursuant to this Court's Order Granting Stipulations [ECF No. 21], Defendants filed a consolidated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 22] (the "Motion"). Currently, Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Motion is due by March 28, 2018, while Defendants' Reply in support of the Motion would be due in the normal course within seven days of being served with Plaintiffs' Opposition. See — LR 7-2. In light of the legal claims and theories at issue, the number of cases and parties involved, and the ultimate impact of this Court's decision on the Motion, the Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, and request the Court to approve, that:

1. The current deadline of March 28, 2018 for Plaintiffs to file an Opposition to the Motion be extended to Friday, April 13, 2018, which is 30 days after the filing of the Motion on March 14, 2018; and

2. Defendants shall have up to and including May 14, 2018, which is 30 days after the filing of Plaintiffs' Opposition, to file a Reply in support of the Motion.

These stipulations are made in agreement between Plaintiffs and Defendants in the instant action and consolidated cases, Case Nos. 2:17-cv-02841, 2:17-cv-02848, 2:17-cv-02859, for the limited purpose of determining Subject Matter Jurisdiction, and are made in good faith in order to enhance the presentation of seminal issues before this Court, and to preserve party and judicial resources.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer