Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mayfield v. Capital One Bank, N.A., 2:17-cv-03097-RFB-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180327h63 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [FIRSTREQUEST] RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Defendant, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("JPMC"), by and through its undersigned counsel of record, and Plaintiff, Roshonda Mayfield ("Plaintiff") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through her undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On Decembe
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

[FIRSTREQUEST]

Defendant, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("JPMC"), by and through its undersigned counsel of record, and Plaintiff, Roshonda Mayfield ("Plaintiff") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through her undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On December 21, 2017, Plaintiff filed her Complaint alleging, inter alia, claims against JPMC [ECF No. 1].

2. On February 15, 2018, JPMC filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [ECF No. 19].

3. On March 1, 2018, the Parties filed a Stipulation for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to file a response to JPMC's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 28]. The Stipulation was granted on March 2, 2018, which set the deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to JPMC's Motion to Dismiss up to and including March 15, 2018 [ECF No. 29].

4. On March 15, 2018, Plaintiff filed her response to JPMC's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 31].

5. JPMC's deadline to file its reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss is March 22, `.

6. Plaintiff and JPMC have stipulated to allow JPMC additional time to file its reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss in order to facilitate further communications between Plaintiff and JPMC while the Parties are pursuing in good-faith a potential resolution of Plaintiff's claims against JPMC. This is the first request for an extension of time of JPMC's March 22, 2018 deadline.

The Parties accordingly request an extension for JPMC to file its reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint up to and including March 30, 2018.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer