Filed: Mar. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSTION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1) and LR IA 6-1, Remark Holdings, Inc., Kankan Limited, and Adam Roseman hereby stipulate to the extension of Adam Roseman's deadline to respond to the complaint to April 25, 2018 . Plaintiffs filed the complaint on February 21, `, ( see ECF No. 1). Adam Roseman was served on March 5, 2018, and his response to the Complaint is currently
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSTION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1) and LR IA 6-1, Remark Holdings, Inc., Kankan Limited, and Adam Roseman hereby stipulate to the extension of Adam Roseman's deadline to respond to the complaint to April 25, 2018 . Plaintiffs filed the complaint on February 21, `, ( see ECF No. 1). Adam Roseman was served on March 5, 2018, and his response to the Complaint is currently d..
More
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSTION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1) and LR IA 6-1, Remark Holdings, Inc., Kankan Limited, and Adam Roseman hereby stipulate to the extension of Adam Roseman's deadline to respond to the complaint to April 25, 2018. Plaintiffs filed the complaint on February 21, `, (see ECF No. 1). Adam Roseman was served on March 5, 2018, and his response to the Complaint is currently due on Monday, March 26, 2018 (see ECF No. 7). The other defendants have not been served. The additional time is necessary for Adam Roseman and his undersigned counsel to complete their evaluation of the complaint. This is the parties' first request for an extension.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
